home

about us

upcoming events

news

op-ed

readers' page

features

archives

guidelines : letters to the editor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Re:  How Green Is Del Mar?
A Web Exclusive: This letter to editor did not appear in the print edition | posted on the web August 7, 2008


Dear Editor,

Having grown up in Hobart, Tasmania, [which, by the way, has the cleanest water in the world] and having  lived later as an adult in Perth, Western Australia, before coming to Del Mar, I have lived and experienced conservation and using natural resources for energy.

Solar was my way of life in the early 70s ; our heating and the energy source for all our needs, including our heating of our swimming pool, came from solar energy. Low flush toilets to conserve water, drought resistant landscaping to conserve water [we live in a reclaimed desert] -- people should be seriously encouraged to use all these measures to "green" our city.

Kay Hansen, Del Mar

back to top


A Response Re:  Clarification on use of Shores Property  A Web Exclusive: This letter to editor did not appear in the print edition | posted on the web June 3, 2008

The Resolution approved by the City Council in August, 2007 was premised upon the Del Mar Shores fundraisers raising the full cost of the agreed upon $ 8.5 million purchase price. Circumstances have now changed since August, with the City now stepping in with a plan for short term borrowing of $3.5 million to fill a funding gap left by the fundraisers who did not succeed in raising the full amount. By its own terms, the resolution did not bind the City Council to any particular use of the property.  It expressed the intention of the City Council to at least preserve the existing open space but did not specify the uses to be made of the developed portion of the site other than for the Winston School use.   The City has assumed a substantial financial risk in order to preserve the opportunity to purchase the Shores property, borrowing money it does not have.  If the fundraisers fail to raise the additional funds needed, the City will have to find another means of raising the money to repay the debt (special tax, etc.).  Placing the City Hall on that portion of the Shores property currently occupied by the School District is an option the City Council should consider from both a financial , and land use perspective for the entire community. In this way, the cost of the new City Hall construction and possibly the repaying of the $3.5 million debt could be covered by the lease of the existing City Hall site for a mixed retail/ residential development. This would not violate the intent of the City Council as expressed by the August, 2007 resolution. 

Bettina Experton and Wayne Dernetz

Bettina Experton is Chair of the Del Mar Finance Committee.
Wayne Dernetz is a former city manager and city attorney.

back to top

 

It's time to look at our high-priced Sheriff's Contract   A Letter to the Editor | June 2008

Our fair city is always looking for ways to expand revenue sources, but rarely looks at the exploding cost side of government. I think it is time to closely scrutinize our sheriff's contract that has grown over 100% in the last few years with little to no increase in protective services.

In 1998 the Sheriffs budget for our city's police protection was approximately $660,000. In 2008 the same budget, for the same basic services is $1.2 million. The notes in the published city budget states that this cost jump is mostly attributed to exploding pension costs.

Like the City of San Diego , our city is experiencing out-of-control pension increases.

It is high time that our city leaders take a hard look at other police protection options. One option that should be reviewed is forming a brand new police department with the cities of Solana Beach and Encinitas. Thanks to Mayor David Druker for taking a leadership role and bringing this issue up with the mayors of those cities. The solution is NOT to attach our protection needs to other cities like Coronado , Carlsbad , or San Diego . These cities also have the high price of backend benefits as well.

Another solution to explore is a new police force with highly paid police officers and fair pension plans.

We will have two new faces on the council this year with Henry and David retiring. Maybe this new city council can put a priority on reviewing the cost side of government with a focus on our police-protection contract.

Jim Benedict, Del Mar

back to top

 

Clarification on use of Shores Property  
A Letter to the Editor | June 2008

This is in response to Bettina Experton's suggestion, in the May edition, that a new City Hall might be built on the Shores site once it is acquired by the City. Some may be unaware of the history of the City's interest and efforts to acquire the property. The City at one time explored the possibility of putting a new city hall on the Shores property. That idea was considered and rejected by the council several years ago, even before the property was declared surplus by the school district. Again, on August 6, 2007, the council adopted a resolution stating: “The City's long term goal is to maximize the open space and recreational uses on the property. Although other public facilities are permitted under current zoning, the City Council has no intention of pursuing other uses … such as a new fire station or city hall.”

When the City was unable to fund the purchase of the property, generous contributors from Del Mar and the Winston School agreed to help fund the purchase to preserve the educational and recreational use of the property. The contributors, the fundraisers and the community have relied upon the City's stated purposes for acquiring this beautiful five-acre parcel in Del Mar.

We continue to raise funds to pay off a $3.5M note to the District. To suggest now that the City change its position on use of the site would dismay both contributors and fundraisers, whose efforts, along with the City's and the School District 's, have made it possible to at last acquire the Shores property.

Joe Sullivan, Chair, Campaign for Del Mar Shores

back to top

 

Revitalization Score: Residents 1, Landlords 6
A Letter to the Editor | June 2008

If I were writing the headline for the City Council's action on April 7, that's how it would read.

The Council agreed to spend $250,000 for a specific plan to increase retail sales. Just to get its bait back with the city's 1% share of the sales tax, $2,500,000 of new sales will be needed.

Meanwhile, 6% of sales on new rents will go to downtown landlords--a flood of new income on properties with typically low property taxes, especially those sheltered by Proposition 13 (see Dernetz, Nov. 2007 Sandpiper ).

This landlords' windfall will surely not draw support from residents when the plan goes to a vote. To avoid defeat, the downtown owners should throw something meaningful into the pot, and here's a suggestion: Create a Downtown Assessment District for providing parking.

Chuck Newton, Del Mar

back to top

 

Losing Ground In Del Mar  A Letter to the Editor | December 2007

Del Mar underground is not progressive as some DRB members seem to think. If they are impressed by tricky architects' d r awings of “invisible” basements, they might do well to reconsider. Digging yourself into the earth on that scale has proved regressive, taking our once relatively civilized community back to the rough power games of cave dwellers.

In the pre-excavation era, Del Mar was not only one of the loveliest but also more equitable communities in San Diego county, due in part to the Community Plan that for decades regulated issues like bulk, mass, air, light, and density by defining the different floor-area-ratios in different areas of the city. Based on its citizens' mutual agreement to live together in a city, that plan has contributed to their good quality of life, which excluded mansionization. But there was the Achilles heel of the basement provision that has now grown to the 3000+ sq.ft. underground wine cellars, entertainment centers, offices, and guest rooms requiring ever larger, more polluting, more noisy excavations.

Over a period of several years, sand is blown all over the neighborhood, and giant equipment screeches and groans, consuming huge amounts of energy. This waste concerns also human physical and mental energy diminished by ever-growing air and noise pollution, increase of construction equipment traffic, and anxiety about the cumulative geological instability in our hilly town. Just look at the surreal excavation on Klish close by Tewa: the sandstone bluffs are fast disappearing to reveal eerily large spaces underground . Who says that this is good for Del Mar? The ongoing inflation of basement space is the result of individual creative greed, not of a community's wishes. The enormity of the basement provision has crept up on us, but with growing speed and momentum. We need to rethink it as a community.

Dagmar Barnouw, Del Mar

back to top

 

Guidelines : Letters to the Editor

The Sandpiper welcomes readers' letters and articles on topics of interest to the Del Mar community. We strive to provide a variety of viewpoints represented in a responsible manner. Letters should not exceed 100 words; articles should not exceed 350 words.

Writers of letters and articles selected for publication will be notified prior to publication. We regret we cannot return or acknowledge unpublished letters or articles.

Letters may be shortened and articles may be edited to satisfy space requirements. Letters and articles submitted must include the writer's name, address and phone number. Readers may also recommend or propose articles. Send to:

The Sandpiper, Box 2177, Del Mar, CA 92014; or
editor@delmarsandpiper.org

back to top

 

© 2007-08 Del Mar Community Alliance, Inc.  All rights reserved.