 |
Web
Exclusive | Posted August
8, 2008. | The following
article did not appear
in the print edition.
| click
here for a report on
the Council's
action concerning
this issue
at its Monday,
August 11
meeting |
|
by
Mark Whitehead
Currently,
Del Mar's TOT is set
at 10.5%, generating
$1,750,000 for the city
annually, a major source
of our revenue. This
tax rate, paid by visitors
to hotels, is lower
than fees charged in
neighboring San Diego
(10.5 % + 2 % Tourist
Marketing District fee)
and Solana Beach (13%
TOT, effective Jan.
1, 2009). By law, Del
Mar must obtain voter
approval to raise the
TOT. Therefore, the
city is considering
submitting a ballot
measure for the Nov.
4, 2008 allowing the
city to set a TOT rate
of up to 13%. Approval
by a majority of voters
is required. Passage
of the measure provides
the city the option
of raising the TOT;
an increase is not automatic
or obligatory. If raised
the full amount, 2.5%,
to a total of 13%, approximately
$400,000 of new revenue
could be generated annually.
The
Del Mar hotels are seeking
to form a Tourist Marketing
District (TMD) and have
pledged $28,000 to pay
legal and planning fees
for its establishment.
During the Aug. 4 council
meeting they urged that
instead of the city
pursuing a potential
increase in the TOT,
funds the city would
control, that the hotels
be permitted to form
a TMD. Under this structure
they proposed to charge
1-2% of room costs,
fees (as much as 300,000
annually) that would
fund a TMD that the
hotels would direct
in efforts to promote
tourism in Del Mar.
Discussion
at the August 4 council
meeting included a desire
by the city to increase
options for generating
additional revenue,
and a desire for flexibility
in the use of the funds.
The city currently funds
the Del Mar Village
Association (DMVA) ($80,000
current year) which
has engaged in some
village marketing activities.
The DMVA supports the
hotels' request.
To
make the deadline for
the Nov. election, the
council must decide
Monday night whether
to initiate the ballot
measure for a TOT increase.
Alternatively, the hotels
are urging that, instead,
they should form a TMD
funded by new fees that
they would collect.
The council continued
discussion of TOT vs.
TMD until Monday Aug.
11. The issue is unresolved.
So far discussion has
involved primarily the
city council, the DMVA
and the Del Mar hotels.
Residents interested
in the generation and
allocation of city revenue
should weigh-in.
by
Mark Whitehead, former
Mayor
The
city council voted 4:1
(Abarbanel, opposed)
Monday night to place
a
measure on the Nov.
ballot permitting an
increase in the TOT
from
10.5%.
to 13% of hotel charges.
But the ballot measure
language will not reveal
a
last
minute sleight of hand
regarding potential
un-availability of the
full
13% to the City. Hoteliers
were successful in gaining
the
concession
that if they impose
a TMD (Tourist Marketing
District) fee,
that
fee would be considered
when raising the TOT
so as to keep the
total
of TOT and TMD fee competitive
with the totals paid
in
neighboring
cities. This concession
to the Del Mar hoteliers,
codified
by
Monday's ordinance,
could effectively reduce
the potential TOT
revenue
to the City by as much
as $300,000, money that
instead would
be
available to the hoteliers
for marketing. While
the ballot measure
promises
that every dollar of
the TOT will be paid
by visitors and
will "stay
in Del Mar,"
the
revised wording of the
ordinance introduced
by
the
majority council, potentially
will direct huge sums
to the hotels
and
limit the city's take
to less than 13%. The
council was generally
dismissive
of the sincere,
well-reasoned and unanimous
urgings of
residents
who argued to the council
that we have pressing
infrastructure
needs: a pump station,
a lifeguard headquarters,
unmet
obligations
to pay for the Shores
site to name a few.
Residents
argued:
Why should the hoteliers
get a sum equal to half
the public
improvement
budget of the City annually?

Click here to
watch
the video
of the
City Council's
August
11 meeting,
including
the public
testimony
and council
deliberation
and action
on the
TOT ballot
measure. |
|
back
to main page
to
top of this page |
 |